Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mahitahi HauoraMahitahi Hauora
VS
HerbalifeHerbalife
Mahitahi Hauora

Mahitahi Hauora

29-30 Rust Avenue, Whangarei, New Zealand, Whangarei, 0110, OO

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
696/1000Weak

Mahitahi Hauora is Northland’s largest Primary Health Organisation. A significant proportion of our enrolled patients are Māori, many are living in rural areas in high levels of deprivation and have complex health needs. Our vision is an equitable healthcare system th...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:30
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Herbalife

Herbalife

800 W Olympic Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90015

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.herbalife.com
770/1000Fair

Herbalife is a global health and wellness community born to support you in living your best life. For over 40 years and in more than 90 countries, we’ve empowered millions of people to make real changes to their lives with our science-backed products, the support of a c...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:15,103
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mahitahi Hauora

Mahitahi Hauora

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Herbalife

Herbalife

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Mahitahi Hauora has 39.76% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Herbalife in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mahitahi Hauora (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mahitahi Hauora cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Herbalife (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Herbalife cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mahitahi Hauora

Mahitahi Hauora

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAH1767814456
Herbalife

Herbalife

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mahitahi Hauora company and Herbalife company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora company and Herbalife company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora company and Herbalife company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora company and Herbalife company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora company and Herbalife company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora company and Herbalife company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora company and Herbalife company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora company and Herbalife company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora company and Herbalife company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora company and Herbalife company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora company and Herbalife company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora and Herbalife, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora and Herbalife, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mahitahi Hauora or Herbalife ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mahitahi Hauora or Herbalife ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora and Herbalife, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mahitahi Hauora and Herbalife, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8