Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mahindra Agri Solutions LimitedMahindra Agri Solutions Limited
VS
SyngentaSyngenta
Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited

Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited

Main Office Mahindra Agri Solutions Ltd Farm Equipment Sector, 5th Floor, EPU Building Gate No. 4 , Akurli Road, Kandivali East, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400101, IN

Last Update: 04/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mahindraagri.com
757/1000Fair

Mahindra Agri Solutions works with farmers across the globe. Our Technology enabled products, services and Agri initiatives deliver solutions to millions of farmers, enabling prosperity and helping them to Rise.

NAICS:111
NAICS Definition:Crop Production
Employees:375
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Syngenta

Syngenta

Rosentalstrasse 67, Basel, Basel, CH, 4002

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.syngenta.com
815/1000Good

Syngenta is one of the world’s leading agriculture companies. Our ambition is to help safely feed the world while taking care of the planet. We aim to improve the sustainability, quality and safety of agriculture with world class science and innovative crop solutions. ...

NAICS:111
NAICS Definition:Crop Production
Employees:35,809
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited

Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Syngenta

Syngenta

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Farming Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Farming Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Syngenta in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Syngenta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Syngenta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited

Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Syngenta

Syngenta

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited company and Syngenta company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited company and Syngenta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited company and Syngenta company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited company and Syngenta company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited company and Syngenta company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited company and Syngenta company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited company and Syngenta company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited company and Syngenta company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited company and Syngenta company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited company and Syngenta company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited company and Syngenta company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited and Syngenta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited and Syngenta, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited or Syngenta ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited or Syngenta ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited and Syngenta, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mahindra Agri Solutions Limited and Syngenta, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2