Comparison Overview
Mahan Air
Mahan Air
Mahan Air Tower, Azadegan St., Karaj Highway, Tehran, Tehran, IR, 1481655761
Last Update: 13/03/2026
Mahan Air recognizes the dedication and diligence of 3300 staff as the key factor in our success. Every effort is made to create an exciting and rewarding working environment for them. To support our service excellence strategy, Mahan Air has adopted a rigorous quali...
Delta Air Lines
1030 Delta Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30320-6001
Last Update: 01/08/2026
Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) is the U.S. global airline leader in safety, innovation, reliability and customer experience. Powered by our employees around the world, Delta has for a decade led the airline industry in operational excellence while maintaining our reputatio...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Mahan Air
Delta Air Lines
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mahan Air in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
Delta Air Lines has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Mahan Air (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mahan Air cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Delta Air Lines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Delta Air Lines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Mahan Air
Delta Air Lines
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.