Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
MagicLabs

MagicLabs Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

magiclabs.gg

Worked with top consumer apps and gaming studios like CreativeMode (YC 24), IO Interactive, Glam AI, etc. Over 700M+ views and 500k+ users added and counting.


MagicLabs A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

MagicLabs
Company Information
Website:https://www.magiclabs.gg
Employees number:2
Number of followers:640
NAICS:5418
Industry Type:Marketing Services
Homepage:magiclabs.gg
MagicLabs Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 700 and 749
logo
MagicLabsMarketing Services
Updated:
29/04/2026
748/1000
Moderate
Ba
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
MagicLabs Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
MagicLabsMarketing Services
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

MagicLabs
MagicLabsModerate
Current Score
748Ba (MODERATE)
01000
1 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
656Before Incident
MAY 2026
654Before Incident
APRIL 2026
748Before Incident
Breach
28 Apr 2026MagicLabs
Polymarket: Polymarket denies data breach, says hacker is selling public data

Polymarket Denies Data Breach After Hacker Claims Theft of 300,000 Records

748After Incident
CRITICAL0
POL1777458829
Polymarket Denies Data Breach After Hacker Claims Theft of 300,000 Records Prediction markets platform Polymarket has refuted allegations of a data breach after a hacker, operating under the pseudonym xorcat, posted claims on the dark web that they had stolen over 300,000 records, including 10,000 unique user profiles containing full names, profile images, proxy wallets, and base addresses. The screenshots of the post, shared by cybersecurity firm Vecert Analyzer and dark web monitoring accounts on X (formerly Twitter), surfaced on Tuesday. Polymarket dismissed the claims as "complete and utter nonsense," asserting that the allegedly stolen data was already publicly accessible via its API endpoints and on-chain records. The platform emphasized that its transparency as a blockchain-based service means all data is auditable by design a feature, not a vulnerability. In a follow-up statement, Polymarket mocked the hacker’s attempt to monetize freely available information, questioning whether venture capital funding had backed the stunt. The hacker, however, argued that the data was obtained through undocumented API endpoints, pagination bypasses, and CORS misconfigurations in Polymarket’s Gamma and CLOB APIs. Xorcat also claimed to have breached other prediction markets and threatened to release additional data in the coming days. The motive, according to the hacker, was Polymarket’s lack of a bug bounty program though the platform has had an active program since April 16, receiving 446 reports as of Wednesday. Security experts have cast doubt on the breach claims. Vladimir S, Chief Security Officer at Legalblock, suggested the incident appeared to be a case of parsed public data being misrepresented as a database leak. The incident comes amid a surge in crypto-related exploits, with blockchain security firm Hacken reporting $482 million in losses across 44 Web3 incidents in Q1 2026. Polymarket’s denial highlights the ongoing tension between transparency in decentralized platforms and the risks of data exposure.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data Exposure / Alleged Breach
MOTIVATION
Lack of bug bounty program (disputed by Polymarket)
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 300,000 records (alleged), including 10,000 unique user profiles with full names, profile images, proxy wallets, and base addressesSystems Affected: Gamma and CLOB APIsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential reputational damage due to allegationsIdentity Theft Risk: High (PII exposed: full names, wallet addresses)Payment Information Risk: High (proxy wallets and base addresses exposed)
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: User profiles (full names, profile images, proxy wallets, base addresses)Number Of Records Exposed: 300,000 (alleged)Sensitivity Of Data: High (PII and cryptocurrency wallet information)Data Exfiltration: Claimed by hacker, denied by PolymarketPersonally Identifiable Information: Full names, profile images, wallet addresses
MARCH 2026
748Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
748Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
748Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
748Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
748Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
748Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
748Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
748Before Incident
JULY 2025
748Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for MagicLabs ?
?
What was MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on MagicLabs's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with MagicLabs ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view MagicLabs's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?