Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Magic BlockchainQAMagic BlockchainQA
VS
XP Inc.XP Inc.
Magic BlockchainQA

Magic BlockchainQA

24th Floor, Suite 2412, New York, 10119, US

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

MagicBlockchainQA is world’s first ever dedicated testing company that helps blockchain ventures to launch themselves without worrying about quality or compliance. MagicBlockChainQA intends to take full ownership of testing from businesses that are busy building Blockch...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:2
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
XP Inc.

XP Inc.

Avenida Chedid Jafet 75, Torre sul 30º andar, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 04551-065

Last Update: 19/05/2026

View Profile
792/1000Fair

A XP Inc. é uma das maiores instituições financeiras independente do Brasil, dona das marcas XP, Rico, Clear, XP Educação, InfoMoney, entre outras. Com mais de 4,6 milhões de clientes ativos e um valor superior a R$ 1,3 trilhão de ativos sob custódia, há 24 anos vem tra...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:12,987
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Magic BlockchainQA

Magic BlockchainQA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
XP Inc.

XP Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Magic BlockchainQA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for XP Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Magic BlockchainQA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Magic BlockchainQA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - XP Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

XP Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Magic BlockchainQA

Magic BlockchainQA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
XP Inc.

XP Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Magic BlockchainQA company and XP Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA company and XP Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA company and XP Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA company and XP Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA company and XP Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA company and XP Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA and XP Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA and XP Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Magic BlockchainQA or XP Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Magic BlockchainQA or XP Inc. ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA and XP Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Magic BlockchainQA and XP Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA