Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Magic Software Inc.Magic Software Inc.
VS
inDriveinDrive
Magic Software Inc.

Magic Software Inc.

24th Floor, Suite 2412, New York, 10119, US

Last Update: 08/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.magicsw.com
758/1000Fair

Magic Software Inc is leading technology development company that focuses on bringing digital solutions to different industries. Magic EdTech(www.MagicEdTech.com) is a leading brand that builds custom digital solutions and services for the education and corporate lear...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:1,818
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
inDrive

inDrive

Mountain View, 94040, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.inDrive.com
782/1000Fair

inDrive is a global mobility and urban services platform. The inDrive app has been downloaded over 400 million times, and has been the second most downloaded mobility app for the third consecutive year. In addition to ride-hailing, inDrive provides an expanding list of ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,675
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Magic Software Inc.

Magic Software Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
inDrive

inDrive

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Magic Software Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for inDrive in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Magic Software Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Magic Software Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - inDrive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

inDrive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Magic Software Inc.

Magic Software Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
inDrive

inDrive

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Magic Software Inc. company and inDrive company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Magic Software Inc. company and inDrive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Magic Software Inc. company and inDrive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Magic Software Inc. company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Magic Software Inc. company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Magic Software Inc. company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Magic Software Inc. company and inDrive company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Magic Software Inc. company and inDrive company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Magic Software Inc. company and inDrive company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Magic Software Inc. company and inDrive company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Magic Software Inc. company and inDrive company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Magic Software Inc. and inDrive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Magic Software Inc. and inDrive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Magic Software Inc. or inDrive ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Magic Software Inc. or inDrive ?
Between Magic Software Inc. and inDrive, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Magic Software Inc. and inDrive, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA