MAG Aerospace Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MAG1765245736)

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the MAG Aerospace breach identified under incident ID MAG1765245736.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of MAG Aerospace's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/magaerospace, the number of followers: 35425, the industry type: Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing and the number of employees: 1899 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 699 with a difference of -55 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on MAG Aerospace and their customers.

MAG Aerospace recently reported "MAG Aerospace Employee Data Compromised in Cyberattack", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal data of employees.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Asset quarantines, Network access blocking and Password resets, and began remediation that includes Deactivated affected accounts and domains.

The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Two years of complimentary identity theft protection and fraud detection services offered to potential victims.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating all affected accounts and domains have already been deactivated and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating cyberattack in August with no specific vector mentioned. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating password resets implemented post-breach and Unsecured Credentials: Cloud Secrets (T1552.006) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating military contractor with cloud-based systems implied. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating accessed limited personal data from its systems and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating military contractor likely uses cloud storage. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating asset quarantines, network access blocking implemented post-breach and Indicator Removal: Clear Windows Event Logs (T1070.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating no details on forensic evidence preservation. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no ransomware details, but breach implies potential encryption and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating information stolen could be leveraged in social engineering. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.