Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

On the FlyOn the Fly
VS
A. O. Smith CorporationA. O. Smith Corporation
On the Fly

On the Fly

N/A

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
761/1000Fair

Get to know our businesses and how they get their “Flywheels Spinning” with Larry as he visits Madison companies across the globe.

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
A. O. Smith Corporation

A. O. Smith Corporation

11270 W. Park Place, Milwaukee, WI, US, 53224

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.aosmith.com
780/1000Fair

Celebrating its 150th year of business, A. O. Smith is a leading global water technology and manufacturing company that proudly employs more than 12,000 people who together provide water heating and water treatment solutions. The company is headquartered in Milwaukee,...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:13,956
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
On the Fly

On the Fly

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
A. O. Smith Corporation

A. O. Smith Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for On the Fly in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A. O. Smith Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - On the Fly (X = Date, Y = Severity)

On the Fly cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - A. O. Smith Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A. O. Smith Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
On the Fly

On the Fly

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
A. O. Smith Corporation

A. O. Smith Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between On the Fly company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between On the Fly company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between On the Fly company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between On the Fly company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between On the Fly company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between On the Fly company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between On the Fly company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between On the Fly company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between On the Fly company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between On the Fly company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between On the Fly company and A. O. Smith Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between On the Fly and A. O. Smith Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between On the Fly and A. O. Smith Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - On the Fly or A. O. Smith Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - On the Fly or A. O. Smith Corporation ?
Between On the Fly and A. O. Smith Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between On the Fly and A. O. Smith Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2