Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Macula AI - AI Based Visual InspectionMacula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection
VS
Schneider ElectricSchneider Electric
Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection

Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection

3575 Boul St-Laurent, Montreal, H2X 2T6, CA

Last Update: 09/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.macula-ai.com/
745/1000Moderate

MACULA AI is an end-to-end solution that uses state of the art Artificial intelligence to automatically detect and identify defects on products from manufacturing lines. MACULA AI goes beyond traditional visual inspection methods to adapt to the growth of today's manufa...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Schneider Electric

Schneider Electric

35 Rue Joseph Monier, Rueil Malmaison, 92506, FR

Last Update: 12/08/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.se.com/
616/1000Poor

Schneider Electric is a global energy technology leader, driving efficiency and sustainability by electrifying, automating, and digitalizing industries, businesses, and homes. Its technologies enable buildings, data centers, factories, infrastructure, and grids to ope...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:88,380
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection

Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Schneider Electric

Schneider Electric

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Schneider Electric has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Schneider Electric (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Schneider Electric cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection

Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Schneider Electric

Schneider Electric

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SCHFOR1786559183
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
SCHMAPSOUSIEROC1785680820
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KORKORSCH1767123879

FAQ

Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection company and Schneider Electric company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection company and Schneider Electric company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection company and Schneider Electric company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection company and Schneider Electric company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection company and Schneider Electric company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection company and Schneider Electric company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection and Schneider Electric, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection and Schneider Electric, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection or Schneider Electric ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection or Schneider Electric ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection and Schneider Electric, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Macula AI - AI Based Visual Inspection and Schneider Electric, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9