Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) LtdMacsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd
VS
DS SmithDS Smith
Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd

Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd

7 Brook Rd, Ekurhuleni, Gauteng, ZA, 1459

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.macsteel.co.za
756/1000Fair

With a rich legacy spanning over 120 years, we are immensely proud of our status as a leading merchandiser and distributor of steel and value added steel products. Our extensive product portfolio, robust infrastructure and technical competencies, combined with our conti...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:956
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
DS Smith

DS Smith

1 Paddington Square, Level 3, LONDON, GB, W2 1DL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dssmith.com
788/1000Fair

DS Smith provides innovative packaging solutions, paper products and recycling services with a commitment to sustainability and a circular economy. Our core purpose is to Redefine Packaging for a Changing World, and our expert teams work closely with like-minded partne...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:13,068
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd

Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DS Smith

DS Smith

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DS Smith in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DS Smith (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DS Smith cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd

Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MAC215716322
DS Smith

DS Smith

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd company and DS Smith company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd company and DS Smith company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd company and DS Smith company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd company and DS Smith company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd company and DS Smith company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd company and DS Smith company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd company and DS Smith company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd company and DS Smith company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd company and DS Smith company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd company and DS Smith company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd company and DS Smith company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd and DS Smith, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd and DS Smith, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd or DS Smith ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd or DS Smith ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd and DS Smith, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Macsteel Service Centres SA (Pty) Ltd and DS Smith, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2