Comparison Overview
Macromedia University of Applied Sciences
Macromedia University of Applied Sciences
Sandstraße 9, München, DE, 80335
Last Update: 01/03/2026
Wir sind eine bundesweit tätige, private Hochschule mit über 5.000 Studierenden und 140 Professorinnen und Professoren. Campus gibt es in München, Stuttgart, Freiburg, Frankfurt, Köln, Hamburg, Leipzig und Berlin. Unterrichtssprachen sind Deutsch und Englisch. Zum Por...
Penn State University
201 Old Main, University Park, pa, US, 16802-1589
Last Update: 12/09/2026
There’s a reason Penn State consistently ranks among the top one percent of the world’s universities. Across 24 campuses, our nearly 88,000 students and 17,000 faculty and staff know the real measure of success goes beyond the classroom—it’s the positive impact made on ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Macromedia University of Applied Sciences
Penn State University
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Macromedia University of Applied Sciences in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Penn State University in 2026.
Incident History - Macromedia University of Applied Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Macromedia University of Applied Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Penn State University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Penn State University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Macromedia University of Applied Sciences
Penn State University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.