Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Macmillan EducationMacmillan Education
VS
Bright HorizonsBright Horizons
Macmillan Education

Macmillan Education

4 Crinan Street, None, London, England, GB, N1 9XW

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

Great teachers empower students to shape their futures and advance in life. At Macmillan Education we use our passion for understanding how learning happens to innovate and create solutions that help deliver great teaching everywhere. #TeachEnglish #AdvancingLearning

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:1,053
Subsidiaries:31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bright Horizons

Bright Horizons

2 Wells Avenue, Newton, 02459, US

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
774/1000Fair

More than 1,000 top employers trust Bright Horizons® (NYSE: BFAM) for proven solutions that support employees, advance careers, and maximize performance. From on-site child care that amplify your culture, back-up care to handle disruptions, and education programs that b...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:14,431
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Macmillan Education

Macmillan Education

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bright Horizons

Bright Horizons

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Macmillan Education in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bright Horizons in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Macmillan Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Macmillan Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bright Horizons (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bright Horizons cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Macmillan Education

Macmillan Education

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bright Horizons

Bright Horizons

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Macmillan Education company and Bright Horizons company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Macmillan Education company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Macmillan Education company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Macmillan Education company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Macmillan Education company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Macmillan Education company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Macmillan Education company and Bright Horizons company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Macmillan Education company and Bright Horizons company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Macmillan Education company and Bright Horizons company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Macmillan Education company and Bright Horizons company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Macmillan Education company and Bright Horizons company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Macmillan Education and Bright Horizons, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Macmillan Education and Bright Horizons, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Macmillan Education or Bright Horizons ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Macmillan Education or Bright Horizons ?
Between Macmillan Education and Bright Horizons, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Macmillan Education and Bright Horizons, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8