Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Mac Pizza Management IncMac Pizza Management Inc
VS
ID Logistics GroupID Logistics Group
Mac Pizza Management Inc

Mac Pizza Management Inc

3104 Texas Ave S, College Station, 77845-5050, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.macpizzamgmt.com
749/1000Moderate

Mac Pizza Management Inc is a restaurant company based out of 3104 Texas Ave S, College Station, Texas, United States.

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:122
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
ID Logistics Group

ID Logistics Group

55, Chemin des Engranauds, Orgon, 13660, FR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
767/1000Fair

ID Logistics, headed by Eric Hémar, is an international contract logistics group with revenues of €3.3 billion in 2024. ID Logistics manages nearly 450 sites in 19 countries, representing more than 9 million m² operated in Europe, America, Asia and Africa, with 42,000 e...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:16,667
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Mac Pizza Management Inc

Mac Pizza Management Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ID Logistics Group

ID Logistics Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mac Pizza Management Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ID Logistics Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Mac Pizza Management Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mac Pizza Management Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ID Logistics Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ID Logistics Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Mac Pizza Management Inc

Mac Pizza Management Inc

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MAC037091825
ID Logistics Group

ID Logistics Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Mac Pizza Management Inc company and ID Logistics Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc company and ID Logistics Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc company and ID Logistics Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc company and ID Logistics Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc company and ID Logistics Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc company and ID Logistics Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc company and ID Logistics Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc company and ID Logistics Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc company and ID Logistics Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc company and ID Logistics Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc company and ID Logistics Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc and ID Logistics Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc and ID Logistics Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Mac Pizza Management Inc or ID Logistics Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Mac Pizza Management Inc or ID Logistics Group ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc and ID Logistics Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Mac Pizza Management Inc and ID Logistics Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA