Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Maag Witte GmbHMaag Witte GmbH
VS
Atlas Copco GroupAtlas Copco Group
Maag Witte GmbH

Maag Witte GmbH

Lise-Meitner-Allee 20, Tornesch, 25436, DE

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.maag.com
743/1000Moderate

The MAAG Group is a broadly diversified global solutions provider with integrated and customizable systems in process technology for the polymer, chemical and petrochemical industries. Its Pump & Filtration Systems, Pelletizing & Pulverizing Systems, Recycling Systems a...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:29
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Atlas Copco Group

Atlas Copco Group

Sickla Industriväg 19, Stockholm, 10523, SE

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
781/1000Fair

Atlas Copco Group enables technology that transforms the future. We innovate to develop products, services and solutions that are key to our customers’ success. Our four business areas offer compressed air and vacuum solutions, energy solutions, dewatering and industria...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:48,857
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Maag Witte GmbH

Maag Witte GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atlas Copco Group

Atlas Copco Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maag Witte GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Copco Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Maag Witte GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maag Witte GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atlas Copco Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Copco Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Maag Witte GmbH

Maag Witte GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Atlas Copco Group

Atlas Copco Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Maag Witte GmbH company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH company and Atlas Copco Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH and Atlas Copco Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH and Atlas Copco Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Maag Witte GmbH or Atlas Copco Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Maag Witte GmbH or Atlas Copco Group ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH and Atlas Copco Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Maag Witte GmbH and Atlas Copco Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-113705
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-9825
SUMMARY

IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94402
SUMMARY

IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93888
SUMMARY

IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93744
SUMMARY

IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-20
UPDATED
Date2026-10-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9