Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

M Susi & Son Inc.M Susi & Son Inc.
VS
KiewitKiewit
M Susi & Son Inc.

M Susi & Son Inc.

US

Last Update: 15/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://msusi.com
721/1000Moderate

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Kiewit

Kiewit

1550 Mike Fahey St., Omaha, 68102, US

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://kiewit.com
759/1000Fair

At Kiewit, the projects we deliver make a difference, and we offer opportunities for you to make one, too. Our construction and engineering professionals work on some of the industry’s most complex, challenging and rewarding projects – whether it’s boring tunnels throug...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:26,728
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
M Susi & Son Inc.

M Susi & Son Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kiewit

Kiewit

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

M Susi & Son Inc. has 36.31% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

Kiewit has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - M Susi & Son Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M Susi & Son Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kiewit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kiewit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
M Susi & Son Inc.

M Susi & Son Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
M-S1784140727
Kiewit

Kiewit

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KIE1787783299

FAQ

Between M Susi & Son Inc. company and Kiewit company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. company and Kiewit company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. company and Kiewit company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. company and Kiewit company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. company and Kiewit company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. company and Kiewit company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. and Kiewit, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. and Kiewit, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - M Susi & Son Inc. or Kiewit ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - M Susi & Son Inc. or Kiewit ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. and Kiewit, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between M Susi & Son Inc. and Kiewit, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2