Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

M.F. DiScala & Company, IncM.F. DiScala & Company, Inc
VS
REMAXREMAX
M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc

M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc

1 Smith Street, Bldg B, Suite 101, Norwalk, CONNECTICUT, 06851, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.discala.com/
756/1000Fair

Michael F. DiScala is President and Chief Executive Officer of M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc., Real Estate Investment Bankers, headquartered here in Norwalk. Established in 1923, it is a privately held, self-administered, real estate organization which is engaged primari...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:7
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
REMAX

REMAX

5075 S. Syracuse St., Denver, 80237, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.remax.com
737/1000Moderate

As one of the leading global real estate franchisors, RE/MAX, LLC is a subsidiary of RE/MAX Holdings (NYSE: RMAX) with more than 140,000 agents in almost 9,000 offices and a presence in more than 110 countries and territories. Nobody in the world sells more real estat...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:43,488
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc

M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
REMAX

REMAX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for REMAX in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - REMAX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

REMAX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc

M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
REMAX

REMAX

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
JOHREM1770865850

FAQ

Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc company and REMAX company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc company and REMAX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc company and REMAX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc company and REMAX company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc company and REMAX company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc company and REMAX company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc company and REMAX company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc and REMAX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc and REMAX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc or REMAX ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc or REMAX ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc and REMAX, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between M.F. DiScala & Company, Inc and REMAX, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1