Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLCM&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC
VS
Johnson & Johnson MedTechJohnson & Johnson MedTech
M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC

M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC

115-06 Myrtle Ave, New York, NY, US, 11418

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
706/1000Moderate

At M&D Capital Premier Billing, we go beyond traditional billing—delivering specialty-specific, hands-on support that helps medical groups and surgical centers operate more efficiently and profitably. With legal, clinical, and coding experts working together under one r...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:114
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

1 Johnson and Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, New Jersey, US, 08901

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
811/1000Good

At Johnson & Johnson MedTech, we are working to solve the world’s most pressing healthcare challenges through innovations at the intersection of biology and technology. With deep expertise in surgery, orthopaedics, cardiovascular, and vision, we design healthcare soluti...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:36,750
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC

M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson MedTech in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Johnson & Johnson MedTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson MedTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC

M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
M-D05102305112625
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC or Johnson & Johnson MedTech ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC or Johnson & Johnson MedTech ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between M&D Capital Premier Billing, LLC and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2