Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

M&T BankM&T Bank
VS
HSBCHSBC
M&T Bank

M&T Bank

345 Main St., Buffalo, 14203, US

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.mtb.com
669/1000Weak

Great companies have an enduring sense of purpose. At M&T, our purpose is a simple one: make a difference in people’s lives and uplift the communities we serve. Founded in 1856 in Buffalo, NY we are now a top 11 full-service US-based commercial bank with a retail footpr...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:30,274
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
HSBC

HSBC

8 Canada Square, London, E14 5HQ, GB

Last Update: 28/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.hsbc.com
821/1000Good

Opening up a world of opportunity for our customers, investors, ourselves and the planet. We're a financial services organisation that serves more than 40 million customers, ranging from individual savers and investors to some of the world’s biggest companies and gover...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:192,405
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
M&T Bank

M&T Bank

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
HSBC

HSBC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

M&T Bank has 45.95% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HSBC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - M&T Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&T Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - HSBC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HSBC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
M&T Bank

M&T Bank

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
M&TTHI1776869694
🔒 Incident : Breach
M&TLAW1776869766
HSBC

HSBC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THEBARHSBLLONATMAR1774391436
🔒 Incident : Breach
HSB019090625
🔒 Incident : Breach
HSB301072825

FAQ

Between M&T Bank company and HSBC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between M&T Bank company and HSBC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between M&T Bank company and HSBC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between M&T Bank company and HSBC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between M&T Bank company and HSBC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between M&T Bank company and HSBC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between M&T Bank company and HSBC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between M&T Bank company and HSBC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between M&T Bank company and HSBC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between M&T Bank company and HSBC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between M&T Bank company and HSBC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between M&T Bank and HSBC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between M&T Bank and HSBC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - M&T Bank or HSBC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - M&T Bank or HSBC ?
Between M&T Bank and HSBC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between M&T Bank and HSBC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57100
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Entra Provisioning Service (SyncFabric) allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-54998
SUMMARY

Incorrect authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45499
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure OpenAI allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-41106
SUMMARY

Url redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-26145
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Azure Synapse allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-02
UPDATED
Date2026-07-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2