Comparison Overview
Lyreco Group

Lyreco Group
Rue du 19 Mars 1962, Marly, Hauts-de-France, 59770, FR
Last Update: 23/04/2026
The Lyreco Group is the European leader and the third largest distributor of workplace products and services in the world. A privately-owned company since 1926, Lyreco is now present in 25 countries with 13 partners in 15 additional countries, operating in 40 different ...

Staples
500 Staples Drive, Framingham, 01702, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
For nearly 40 years, Staples has been a trusted leader in delivering end-to-end workplace solutions for consumers and businesses of all sizes across a broad range of industries. The company provides a comprehensive portfolio of products, strategic solutions, and service...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Lyreco Group







Staples






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lyreco Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Avg (This Year)
Staples has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Lyreco Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lyreco Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Staples (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Staples cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Lyreco Group

Staples
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.