Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)
VS
SwisscomSwisscom
Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

244 5th Avenue, New York,, 10001, US

Last Update: 02/10/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://arcova.com
709/1000Moderate

Lynx Technology Partners is now part of Arcova. Founded in 2009, Lynx Technology Partners built a strong reputation for excellence in cybersecurity, compliance, and strategic advisory services. The firm was known for its disciplined execution and relationship-driven ap...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:18
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Swisscom

Swisscom

Alte Tiefenaustrasse 6, Worblaufen, 3048, CH

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.swisscom.ch/
757/1000Fair

As No. 1, we inspire people in the connected world. With the latest technologies and innovations, together we have the opportunity to shape the future. To do this, we are and act trustworthy, committed and curious. Are you with us? Join us on this exciting journey and ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:15,556
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swisscom

Swisscom

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Swisscom has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swisscom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swisscom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GITNPMCHEKEDLYN1790944654
Swisscom

Swisscom

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SWI1786128838
🔒 Incident : Breach
SWI11477622

FAQ

Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Swisscom company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Swisscom company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Swisscom company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Swisscom company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Swisscom company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) company and Swisscom company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) and Swisscom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) and Swisscom, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) or Swisscom ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) or Swisscom ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) and Swisscom, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lynx Technology Partners (now Arcova) and Swisscom, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9