Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lyf PayLyf Pay
VS
KBC Bank & VerzekeringKBC Bank & Verzekering
Lyf Pay

Lyf Pay

94, Rue de Provence, Paris, 75009, FR

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lyf.eu
755/1000Fair

Naissance d’un acteur majeur dans le paiement mobile Lyf Pay - issue de la fusion de Fivory et Wa! – est la nouvelle solution universelle de paiement mobile au service de la relation client Lyf Pay va enrichir et simplifier la vie de ses clients. Annoncée en octobre de...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:247
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
KBC Bank & Verzekering

KBC Bank & Verzekering

Havenlaan 2, 1000 Brussel, Brussels, BE, 1080

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.kbc.be
775/1000Fair

Welkom op de officiële LinkedIn-pagina van KBC! Bekijk onze vacatures op de tab ‘Vacatures’. KBC is een geïntegreerde bank-verzekeraar die zich hoofdzakelijk richt op particulieren en privatebankingcliënten, en op kleine en middelgrote ondernemingen. KBC heeft een le...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:13,414
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lyf Pay

Lyf Pay

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
KBC Bank & Verzekering

KBC Bank & Verzekering

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lyf Pay in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KBC Bank & Verzekering in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lyf Pay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyf Pay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - KBC Bank & Verzekering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KBC Bank & Verzekering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lyf Pay

Lyf Pay

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
KBC Bank & Verzekering

KBC Bank & Verzekering

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lyf Pay company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lyf Pay company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lyf Pay company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lyf Pay company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lyf Pay company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lyf Pay company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lyf Pay company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lyf Pay company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lyf Pay company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lyf Pay company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lyf Pay company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lyf Pay and KBC Bank & Verzekering, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lyf Pay and KBC Bank & Verzekering, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lyf Pay or KBC Bank & Verzekering ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lyf Pay or KBC Bank & Verzekering ?
Between Lyf Pay and KBC Bank & Verzekering, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lyf Pay and KBC Bank & Verzekering, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-26422
SUMMARY

clash-verge-service-ipc before 2.3.0 has a world-reachable IPC endpoint, leading to local privilege escalation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-11441
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This vulnerability affects the function canAccessIssue of the file /issues/ of the component Pull Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument issue leads to improper authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to resolve this issue. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11440
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. This affects an unknown part of the file /repositories/{projectId}/default-branch of the component REST API. This manipulation of the argument project.defaultBranch causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 is able to mitigate this issue. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11439
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /projects/ of the component Parent Project Handler. The manipulation of the argument project.parentId results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 can resolve this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-11438
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in theonedev onedev up to 15.0.5. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /projects. The manipulation of the argument project.forkedFromId leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. Upgrading to version 15.0.6 addresses this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-06
UPDATED
Date2026-06-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8