Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LyfebinLyfebin
VS
UMC UtrechtUMC Utrecht
Lyfebin

Lyfebin

Los Angeles, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lyfebin.com
764/1000Fair

Lyfebin is a HIPAA secure environment for patients and doctors to view and share medical images aka DICOM files (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital radiography etc.) and clinical pictures all on the cloud using next generation security....

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
UMC Utrecht

UMC Utrecht

Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3508GA, NL

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile

The University Medical Center Utrecht is one of the largest academic healthcare institutions in the Netherlands. We provide the best healthcare for today’s patients, and we also work towards a healthy society in the future. Our organization has three core tasks: care, r...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:10,674
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lyfebin

Lyfebin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UMC Utrecht

UMC Utrecht

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lyfebin in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UMC Utrecht in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lyfebin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyfebin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UMC Utrecht (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UMC Utrecht cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lyfebin

Lyfebin

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
LYF2358523
UMC Utrecht

UMC Utrecht

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lyfebin company and UMC Utrecht company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lyfebin company and UMC Utrecht company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lyfebin company and UMC Utrecht company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lyfebin company and UMC Utrecht company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lyfebin company and UMC Utrecht company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lyfebin company and UMC Utrecht company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lyfebin company and UMC Utrecht company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lyfebin company and UMC Utrecht company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lyfebin company and UMC Utrecht company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lyfebin company and UMC Utrecht company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lyfebin company and UMC Utrecht company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lyfebin and UMC Utrecht, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lyfebin and UMC Utrecht, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lyfebin or UMC Utrecht ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lyfebin or UMC Utrecht ?
Between Lyfebin and UMC Utrecht, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lyfebin and UMC Utrecht, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-73250
SUMMARY

Notepad++ is a free and open-source source code editor. Prior to 8.9.7, the Notepad++ Windows 11 x64 and ARM64 installer passes the attacker-influenced installation directory `$INSTDIR` from PowerEditor/installer/nppSetup.nsi into a PowerShell `-Command` string used by RegisterMSIX to invoke Add-AppxPackage, allowing PowerShell subexpression syntax such as `$()` in the installation path to execute commands in the installer's security context when the context menu component is selected. This issue is fixed in version 8.9.7.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-73249
SUMMARY

calibre is an e-book manager. Prior to 9.12.0, the calibre Content Server endpoint POST /book-update-annotations/{library_id}/{book_id}/{fmt} in src/calibre/srv/books.py omits needs_db_write=True, causing Router.dispatch() to skip ctx.check_for_write_access() before update_annotations() passes attacker-controlled JSON to db.merge_annotations_for_book(), which allows a readonly user or an anonymous user on an unauthenticated deployment to persist unauthorized book annotation changes. This issue is fixed in version 9.12.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-73248
SUMMARY

calibre is an e-book manager. Prior to 9.12.0, calibre processes attacker-controlled composite_template metadata from a malicious EPUB, OPF, PDF, or similar file through program: and a nested template() call whose formatter does not inherit allow_python_templates=False, allowing a nested python: template to reach compile_python_template and execute arbitrary Python code when the file is opened or imported. This issue is fixed in version 9.12.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-73247
SUMMARY

Kestra is an open-source, event-driven orchestration platform. Prior to 2.0.0, Kestra's core/src/main/java/io/kestra/core/runners/pebble/functions/HttpFunction.java passes the user-controlled http() uri argument to URI.create() and the server-side HTTP client without restricting private, loopback, or link-local destinations, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to import and execute a flow that accesses internal services or cloud metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-73246
SUMMARY

Kestra is an open-source, event-driven orchestration platform. Prior to 2.0.0-rc6, Kestra's worker/src/main/java/io/kestra/worker/endpoint/WorkerEndpoint.java serves GET /worker without authentication and serializes the complete live Task object, which can expose commands, environment variables, HTTP headers, connection details, plaintext credentials, and execution identifiers while the main API on port 8080 remains protected. This issue is fixed in 2.0.0-rc6.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-11
UPDATED
Date2026-08-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9