Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LyfebinLyfebin
VS
City of HopeCity of Hope
Lyfebin

Lyfebin

Los Angeles, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lyfebin.com
764/1000Fair

Lyfebin is a HIPAA secure environment for patients and doctors to view and share medical images aka DICOM files (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital radiography etc.) and clinical pictures all on the cloud using next generation security....

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
City of Hope

City of Hope

1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, US, 91010

Last Update: 17/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cityofhope.org
712/1000Moderate

City of Hope's mission is to deliver the cures of tomorrow to the people who need them today. Founded in 1913, City of Hope has grown into one of the largest cancer research and treatment organizations in the U.S. and one of the leading research centers for diabetes and...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:12,192
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lyfebin

Lyfebin

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
City of Hope

City of Hope

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lyfebin in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

City of Hope has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Lyfebin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lyfebin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - City of Hope (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Hope cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lyfebin

Lyfebin

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
LYF2358523
City of Hope

City of Hope

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CITINF1781735198
🔒 Incident : Breach
CIT911072625
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CIT107072625

FAQ

Between Lyfebin company and City of Hope company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lyfebin company and City of Hope company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lyfebin company and City of Hope company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lyfebin company and City of Hope company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lyfebin company and City of Hope company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lyfebin company and City of Hope company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lyfebin company and City of Hope company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lyfebin company and City of Hope company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lyfebin company and City of Hope company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lyfebin company and City of Hope company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lyfebin company and City of Hope company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lyfebin and City of Hope, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lyfebin and City of Hope, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lyfebin or City of Hope ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lyfebin or City of Hope ?
Between Lyfebin and City of Hope, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lyfebin and City of Hope, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8