Comparison Overview
Luz Saúde

Luz Saúde
Rua Carlos Alberto da Mota Pinto, 17-9.º, Lisboa, 1070-313, PT
Last Update: 12/05/2026
A Luz Saúde foi criada em 2000 e é um dos maiores grupos de prestação de cuidados de saúde no mercado português. O Grupo presta os seus serviços através de 30 unidades (onde se incluem 14 hospitais privados, 15 clínicas privadas a operar em regime de ambulatório e uma ...

The Cigna Group
900 Cottage Grove Rd, Bloomfield, 06002, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The Cigna Group is a global health company committed to creating a better future built on the vitality of every individual and every community. We relentlessly challenge ourselves to partner and innovate solutions for better health. The Cigna Group includes products a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Luz Saúde







The Cigna Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Luz Saúde in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Cigna Group in 2026.
Incident History - Luz Saúde (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Luz Saúde cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - The Cigna Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The Cigna Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Luz Saúde

The Cigna Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. Affected is the function formWlEncrypt of the file /boafrm/formWlEncrypt. The manipulation of the argument submit-url leads to buffer overflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
A vulnerability was determined in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This impacts the function formWlAc of the file /boafrm/formWlAc. Executing a manipulation of the argument submit-url can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
A flaw was found in the OpenShift console. Unauthenticated access to the `/api/devfile/` and `/api/devfile/samples/` endpoints allows a remote attacker to send crafted devfile payloads. This can lead to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF), where the console pod makes requests to internal services and reflects partial responses to the attacker. Additionally, by sending repeated large requests without a specified content length, an attacker can cause unbounded memory growth, leading to a Denial of Service (DoS).
In Vinyl Cache before 9.0,2, workspace buffer overflow vulnerability was found in the .upper() and .lower() string type methods of VCL. This can be used as a remote denial of service (DoS) vector to make the child process segfault or assert, and then restart. Effectively exploiting this vulnerability requires prior knowledge about the VCL in use and the ability to craft a request that contains a string that is long enough to fill the remaining workspace at the call site while staying under the different request size limits (http_req_size, http_req_hdr_len, etc.).
A vulnerability was found in Totolink A3002MU Hh-B20211125.1046. This affects the function formSchedule of the file /boafrm/formSchedule. Performing a manipulation of the argument webpage results in buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used.