Comparison Overview
LUXSHARE-ICT

LUXSHARE-ICT
No.17 Kuiqing road, Qinghuang Industrial Zone,Qingxi Town, , Dongguan City, Guangdong, CN, 523660
Last Update: 09/03/2026
Luxshare is one of the world’s leading solution providers for key components, modules, and system assembly in Consumer Electronics, Communication & Data Centers, Automotive and Medical. We focus on technological innovations and efficiently meeting a variety of needs fro...

Samsung Electronics
129 Samsung-ro, Suwon-Si, 443-742, KR
Last Update: 04/10/2026
Samsung Electronics is a global leader in technology, opening new possibilities for people everywhere. Through relentless innovation and discovery, we are transforming the worlds of TVs, smartphones, wearable devices, tablets, digital appliances, network systems, medica...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

LUXSHARE-ICT







Samsung Electronics






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LUXSHARE-ICT in 2026.
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Samsung Electronics has 197.03% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - LUXSHARE-ICT (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LUXSHARE-ICT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Samsung Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Samsung Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

LUXSHARE-ICT

Samsung Electronics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.