Comparison Overview

Luxoft

VS

TransUnion

Luxoft

Gubelstrasse 24, Zug, CH, 6300
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Luxoft, a DXC Technology Company (NYSE: DXC), is a digital strategy and software engineering firm providing bespoke technology solutions that drive business change for customers the world over. Acquired by U.S. company DXC Technology in 2019, Luxoft is a global operation in 44 cities and 21 countries with an international, agile workforce of nearly 18,000 people. It combines a unique blend of engineering excellence and deep industry expertise, helping over 425 global clients innovate in the areas of automotive, financial services, travel and hospitality, healthcare, life sciences, media and telecommunications. DXC Technology is a leading Fortune 500 IT services company which helps global companies run their mission critical systems. Together, DXC and Luxoft offer a differentiated customer-value proposition for digital transformation by combining Luxoft’s front-end digital capabilities with DXC’s expertise in IT modernization and integration. Follow our profile for regular updates and insights into technology and business needs.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 13,905
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

TransUnion

None, None, Chicago, Illinois, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 0 and 549

TransUnion is a global information and insights company that makes trust possible in the modern economy. We do this by providing an actionable picture of each person so they can be reliably represented in the marketplace. As a result, businesses and consumers can transact with confidence and achieve great things. This picture is grounded in our legacy as a credit reporting agency which enables us to tap into both credit and public record data; our data fusion methodology that helps us link, match and tap into the awesome combined power of that data; and our knowledgeable and passionate team, who stewards the information with expertise, and in accordance with local legislation around the world. A leading presence in more than 30 countries across five continents, TransUnion provides solutions that help create economic opportunity, great experiences and personal empowerment for hundreds of millions of people. We call this Information for Good® — it’s our purpose, and what drives us every day. Contact Us Customer support: https://transu.co/60024D64I Business support: https://transu.co/60044D67G

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 16,441
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
5
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luxoft.jpeg
Luxoft
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transunion.jpeg
TransUnion
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Luxoft
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TransUnion
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Luxoft in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

TransUnion has 792.86% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Luxoft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Luxoft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TransUnion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TransUnion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/luxoft.jpeg
Luxoft
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transunion.jpeg
TransUnion
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-party application vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Third-Party Application Vulnerability
Motivation: Data Theft, Extortion (suspected)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Luxoft company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to TransUnion company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TransUnion company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Luxoft company has not reported any.

In the current year, TransUnion company has reported more cyber incidents than Luxoft company.

Neither TransUnion company nor Luxoft company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

TransUnion company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Luxoft company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither TransUnion company nor Luxoft company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Luxoft company nor TransUnion company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Luxoft nor TransUnion holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

TransUnion company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Luxoft company.

TransUnion company employs more people globally than Luxoft company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Luxoft nor TransUnion holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Luxoft nor TransUnion holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Luxoft nor TransUnion holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Luxoft nor TransUnion holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Luxoft nor TransUnion holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Luxoft nor TransUnion holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X