Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LuxCSDLuxCSD
VS
SynchronySynchrony
LuxCSD

LuxCSD

42, Avenue J.F. Kennedy, Luxembourg, undefined, 1855, LU

Last Update: 21/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.luxcsd.com/
752/1000Fair

LuxCSD provides Luxembourg’s financial community with services for settlement in EUR central bank money as well as with issuing and custody services for a wide variety of domestic and international securities including investment funds. In 2020, LuxCSD received its CSDR...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Synchrony

Synchrony

HQ, Stamford, Connecticut, US, 06902

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.synchrony.com
774/1000Fair

At Synchrony, our driving force is to be essential to people's everyday lives by making it easier for the many millions of people who rely on us to access their essential needs and everyday wants with consumer financing that works for them – from their first credit card...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,772
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LuxCSD

LuxCSD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Synchrony

Synchrony

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LuxCSD in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Synchrony in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LuxCSD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LuxCSD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Synchrony (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Synchrony cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LuxCSD

LuxCSD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Synchrony

Synchrony

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYN304072725
🔒 Incident : Breach
SYN645080425

FAQ

Between LuxCSD company and Synchrony company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LuxCSD company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LuxCSD company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LuxCSD company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LuxCSD company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LuxCSD company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LuxCSD company and Synchrony company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LuxCSD company and Synchrony company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LuxCSD company and Synchrony company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LuxCSD company and Synchrony company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LuxCSD company and Synchrony company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LuxCSD and Synchrony, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LuxCSD and Synchrony, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LuxCSD or Synchrony ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LuxCSD or Synchrony ?
Between LuxCSD and Synchrony, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LuxCSD and Synchrony, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-83524
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in RedPort Optimizer wXa-203, Optimizer wXa-213 and Optimizer wXa-223 up to 20260704. This impacts the function exec of the file /xgatev1/system/datetime.php of the component System Clock. The manipulation leads to command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-31
UPDATED
Date2026-08-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-82971
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in QVidium Opera11 3.3.2a26-Ax4x-opera11. This affects an unknown part of the file /cgi-bin/net_tr.cgi of the component CGI Script. This manipulation of the argument ipaddr causes command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor explains: "QVidium has now closed its doors and no longer will be able to sell products or provide support." This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-31
UPDATED
Date2026-08-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS2
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-82957
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in hyperledger-firefly firefly up to 1.4.0. The impacted element is the function ValidateOptions of the file internal/events/webhooks/webhooks.go of the component Webhook Subscription. Performing a manipulation of the argument url results in server-side request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-31
UPDATED
Date2026-08-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-82954
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in Dokploy up to 0.29.7. This issue affects the function writeTraefikConfigInPath of the file packages/server/src/utils/traefik/application.ts of the component Settings. The manipulation of the argument path results in path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-31
UPDATED
Date2026-08-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS2
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-82922
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in ShopEx ECShop up to 2.5.1. This vulnerability affects the function flow_update_cart of the file /flow.php?step=update_cart. The manipulation of the argument rec_id leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-31
UPDATED
Date2026-08-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9