Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LuxCSDLuxCSD
VS
Grupo SalinasGrupo Salinas
LuxCSD

LuxCSD

42, Avenue J.F. Kennedy, Luxembourg, undefined, 1855, LU

Last Update: 21/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.luxcsd.com/
752/1000Fair

LuxCSD provides Luxembourg’s financial community with services for settlement in EUR central bank money as well as with issuing and custody services for a wide variety of domestic and international securities including investment funds. In 2020, LuxCSD received its CSDR...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

MX

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gruposalinas.com
793/1000Fair

Grupo Salinas es un conjunto de empresas dinámicas, que se caracterizan por la evolución constante y la innovación, enfocadas en la creación de valor económico, social y ambiental. Estamos en industrias diversas como comercio especializado, servicios financieros, tele...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:25,796
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LuxCSD

LuxCSD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LuxCSD in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Salinas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LuxCSD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LuxCSD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Salinas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Salinas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LuxCSD

LuxCSD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Salinas

Grupo Salinas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LuxCSD company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LuxCSD company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LuxCSD company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LuxCSD company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LuxCSD company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LuxCSD company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LuxCSD company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LuxCSD company and Grupo Salinas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LuxCSD company and Grupo Salinas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LuxCSD company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LuxCSD company and Grupo Salinas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LuxCSD and Grupo Salinas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LuxCSD and Grupo Salinas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LuxCSD or Grupo Salinas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LuxCSD or Grupo Salinas ?
Between LuxCSD and Grupo Salinas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LuxCSD and Grupo Salinas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES