Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LuxCSDLuxCSD
VS
AllyAlly
LuxCSD

LuxCSD

42, Avenue J.F. Kennedy, Luxembourg, undefined, 1855, LU

Last Update: 21/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.luxcsd.com/
752/1000Fair

LuxCSD provides Luxembourg’s financial community with services for settlement in EUR central bank money as well as with issuing and custody services for a wide variety of domestic and international securities including investment funds. In 2020, LuxCSD received its CSDR...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ally

Ally

500 Woodward Ave, Detroit, MI, US, 48226

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ally.com
721/1000Moderate

Ally Financial Inc. (NYSE: ALLY) is a leading digital financial services company and a top 25 U.S. financial holding company offering financial products for consumers, businesses, automotive dealers and corporate clients. NMLS #3015 | #181005 | https://www.nmlsconsume...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,070
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LuxCSD

LuxCSD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ally

Ally

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LuxCSD in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Ally has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - LuxCSD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LuxCSD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ally (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ally cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LuxCSD

LuxCSD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ally

Ally

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
ALL1773383462
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALL944072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALL932072825

FAQ

Between LuxCSD company and Ally company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LuxCSD company and Ally company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LuxCSD company and Ally company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LuxCSD company and Ally company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LuxCSD company and Ally company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LuxCSD company and Ally company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LuxCSD company and Ally company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LuxCSD company and Ally company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LuxCSD company and Ally company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LuxCSD company and Ally company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LuxCSD company and Ally company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LuxCSD and Ally, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LuxCSD and Ally, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LuxCSD or Ally ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LuxCSD or Ally ?
Between LuxCSD and Ally, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LuxCSD and Ally, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-53532
SUMMARY

OpenEXR is the reference implementation and specification for the EXR image format, widely used in the motion picture industry. In versions 3.4.0 through 3.4.12, a crafted HTJ2K-compressed EXR file causes an unconditional process abort in any application that calls exr_start_read() on untrusted input, resulting in denial of service. The crash is triggered by a QCD marker whose lower five bits are zero, which OpenEXR passes into the vendored OpenJPH library while constructing the codestream and evaluating its quantization delta parameters. OpenJPH uses an assertion rather than a recoverable error to validate those bits, so any invalid value calls abort() directly and cannot be intercepted by surrounding error handling, a problem compounded by OpenEXR wrapping only its internal HT header parser in error handling while leaving the later codestream read and construction calls unprotected. This issue has been resolved in version 3.4.13.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-78435
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in Faveo Helpdesk up to 2.0.3. Affected is the function unlink of the file app/Http/Controllers/Admin/helpdesk/SettingsController.php of the component Logo Handler. Such manipulation of the argument data1 leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.7
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-78434
SUMMARY

A flaw has been found in Faveo Helpdesk up to 2.0.3. This impacts the function FormController::post_ticket_reply of the file app/Http/Controllers/Client/helpdesk/FormController.php of the component post-ticket-reply Endpoint. This manipulation causes missing authentication. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78284
SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Deletion in MasterStudy LMS <= 3.7.42 versions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-78282
SUMMARY

Unauthenticated Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in Stripe Payments <= 2.1.2 versions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-24
UPDATED
Date2026-08-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8