Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lumexa ImagingLumexa Imaging
VS
IHH HealthcareIHH Healthcare
Lumexa Imaging

Lumexa Imaging

4200 Six Forks Road, Raleigh, 27609, US

Last Update: 08/07/2026

View Profile
648/1000Poor

Lumexa Imaging is one of the nation’s largest providers of outpatient medical imaging, with a mission to expand access to advanced, high-quality, and affordable diagnostic care. We operate more than 180 centers across 13 states, including more than 85 centers in joint v...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:563
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
IHH Healthcare

IHH Healthcare

Level 11 Block A, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, 8 Jalan Bukit Pantai, Kuala Lumpur, MY, 59100

Last Update: 12/07/2026

View Profile
785/1000Fair

A world-leading multinational healthcare provider, IHH believes that making a difference starts with our aspiration to Care. For Good. Our team of 70,000 people commit to deliver greater good to our patients, people, the public and our planet, as we live our purpose ...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:27,950
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lumexa Imaging

Lumexa Imaging

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IHH Healthcare

IHH Healthcare

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Lumexa Imaging has 41.84% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IHH Healthcare in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lumexa Imaging (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lumexa Imaging cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IHH Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IHH Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lumexa Imaging

Lumexa Imaging

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LUM1783506490
🔒 Incident : Breach
LUM1779135941
IHH Healthcare

IHH Healthcare

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lumexa Imaging company and IHH Healthcare company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lumexa Imaging company and IHH Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lumexa Imaging company and IHH Healthcare company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lumexa Imaging company and IHH Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lumexa Imaging company and IHH Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lumexa Imaging company and IHH Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lumexa Imaging company and IHH Healthcare company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lumexa Imaging company and IHH Healthcare company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lumexa Imaging company and IHH Healthcare company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lumexa Imaging company and IHH Healthcare company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lumexa Imaging company and IHH Healthcare company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lumexa Imaging and IHH Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lumexa Imaging and IHH Healthcare, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lumexa Imaging or IHH Healthcare ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lumexa Imaging or IHH Healthcare ?
Between Lumexa Imaging and IHH Healthcare, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lumexa Imaging and IHH Healthcare, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63175
SUMMARY

PlaywrightCapture stored capture-specific configuration and runtime data as mutable class-level variables rather than instance-level variables. Consequently, multiple Capture objects running within the same Python process could share state, including HTTP headers, cookies, browser storage, HTTP credentials, proxy configuration, user-agent settings, geolocation information, and captured request data. In a multi-user or concurrent deployment, information supplied during one capture could therefore persist and be reused by a subsequent or parallel capture. This could result in the disclosure of authentication cookies, credentials, browser storage, or captured request data belonging to another user. It could also cause requests to be performed with another capture's authentication context, headers, or proxy configuration, potentially enabling unauthorized access to remote resources or interference with other capture operations. The vulnerability is resolved by initializing all capture-specific settings and request data as instance variables in the Capture constructor, ensuring that state is isolated between capture operations.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-62314
SUMMARY

Anubis is a Web AI Firewall Utility that challenges users' connections in order to protect upstream resources from scraper bots. From 1.22.0 until 1.26.0-pre1, lib/policy/checker.go PathChecker.Check() trusted the client-controlled X-Original-URI header before matching r.URL.Path, allowing an HTTP client to match default data/common/keep-internet-working.yaml ALLOW rules such as ^/\.well-known/.*$ and bypass the Anubis challenge. This issue is fixed in version 1.26.0-pre1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-55652
SUMMARY

Wekan is open source kanban built with Meteor. Prior to 9.46, header-login with HEADER_LOGIN_TRUSTED_IPS uses getRequestIp() in server/lib/headerLoginAuth.js to trust the client-supplied X-Forwarded-For header before the real socket address, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to send HEADER_LOGIN_ID for any username and receive a meteor_login_token session, including for admin. This issue is fixed in version 9.46.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-55576
SUMMARY

MaaAssistantArknights is a one-click tool for daily Arknights tasks. In the current dev-v2 workflow, .github/workflows/release-preparation.yml inlined attacker-controlled github.event.pull_request.title into a run: shell command during the pull_request opened, reopened, and ready_for_review events, so a non-draft fork PR whose title starts with Release v could execute shell commands on the ubuntu-latest runner during the generate-changelog job. This vulnerability is fixed by commit cafc3946059e6337d2089d4fec8b6885ba17c332.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-55445
SUMMARY

Qinglong is a timed task management platform supporting Python3, JavaScript, Shell, and Typescript. Prior to 2.20.1, the init guard middleware in back/loaders/express.ts checks /api/user/init but not /open/user/init, while rewrite('/open/*', '/api/$1') rewrites the whitelisted /open/* path after JWT authentication and the guard have passed; an unauthenticated attacker can send PUT /open/user/init to reset administrator credentials on an initialized instance. This issue is fixed in 2.20.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-15
UPDATED
Date2026-07-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA