Comparison Overview
Lufthansa

Lufthansa
Airportring, Frankfurt am Main, 60549, DE
Last Update: 17/07/2026
Lufthansa is one of the world’s leading airlines, connecting passengers to over 200 destinations across 74 countries from our hubs in Frankfurt and Munich. As an industry pioneer, we are committed to shaping the future of sustainable aviation, investing in next-generat...

British Airways
Harmondsworth, Middlesex, UB7 0GA, GB
Last Update: 15/05/2026
As a global airline and the UK’s flag carrier, British Airways has been flying its customers to where they need to be for more than 100 years. The airline connects Britain with the world and the world with Britain, operating one of the most extensive international sched...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Lufthansa







British Airways






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lufthansa in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
British Airways has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Lufthansa (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lufthansa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - British Airways (X = Date, Y = Severity)
British Airways cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Lufthansa

British Airways
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.
A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.