Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd.Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd.
VS
Turkish AerospaceTurkish Aerospace
Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd.

Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd.

Bao'an International Airport, Shenzhen, 518128, CN

Last Update: 14/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lht-shenzhen.com
746/1000Moderate

Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen (LTS), established in 2000, is a Sino-German joint venture between Lufthansa Technik AG (80%) and Beijing Kailan Aviation Technology Company (20%) for the repair of aircraft components. Located at Shenzhen Bao’an International Airport, LTS is...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:91
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Turkish Aerospace

Turkish Aerospace

Fethiye Mahallesi, Havacilik Bulvari No:17, Ankara, 06980, TR

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tusas.com/
777/1000Fair

Türk Uçak Sanayii Anonim Ortaklığı (TUSAŞ), 28 Haziran 1973 tarihinde Türkiye'nin savunma sanayiinde dışa bağımlılığını azaltmak amacıyla Sanayi ve Teknoloji Bakanlığı bünyesinde kurulmuştur. Türk Hava Kuvvetleri'nin savaş uçağı ihtiyacının karşılanmasına yönelik olara...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:12,563
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd.

Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Turkish Aerospace

Turkish Aerospace

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Turkish Aerospace has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Turkish Aerospace (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Turkish Aerospace cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd.

Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Turkish Aerospace

Turkish Aerospace

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
TUR1786092730

FAQ

Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. company and Turkish Aerospace company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. company and Turkish Aerospace company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. company and Turkish Aerospace company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. company and Turkish Aerospace company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. company and Turkish Aerospace company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. company and Turkish Aerospace company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. company and Turkish Aerospace company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. company and Turkish Aerospace company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. company and Turkish Aerospace company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. company and Turkish Aerospace company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. company and Turkish Aerospace company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. and Turkish Aerospace, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. and Turkish Aerospace, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. or Turkish Aerospace ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. or Turkish Aerospace ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. and Turkish Aerospace, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Shenzhen Co., Ltd. and Turkish Aerospace, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9