Comparison Overview
Lufthansa Technik Philippines

Lufthansa Technik Philippines
MacroAsia Special Economic Zone, Pasay City, Metro Manila, 1309, PH
Last Update: 19/03/2026
LTP provides Maintenance Repair and Overhaul services for commercial aircraft. LTP has 2.700 staff employed in Manila, Cebu, Davao and Clark all Philippines. It is FAA FAR 145 and EASA JAR 145 certified repair station. Focus is providing AIRBUS A320/330/340 Base- and He...

AirAsia
AirAsia Berhad, RedQ, Jalan Pekeliling 5, KLIA2, Sepang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, MY, 64000
Last Update: 04/09/2026
It all starts here. 23 years ago, a dream took flight - shaping and forever changing the travel industry in Asia. The idea was simple: Make flying affordable for everyone. We made that dream happen. We started an airline in 2001. Today, we’ve evolved to become somethi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Lufthansa Technik Philippines







AirAsia






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Technik Philippines in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
AirAsia has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Lufthansa Technik Philippines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lufthansa Technik Philippines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AirAsia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AirAsia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Lufthansa Technik Philippines

AirAsia
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.