Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lufthansa Technik PhilippinesLufthansa Technik Philippines
VS
AeromexicoAeromexico
Lufthansa Technik Philippines

Lufthansa Technik Philippines

MacroAsia Special Economic Zone, Pasay City, Metro Manila, 1309, PH

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
760/1000Fair

LTP provides Maintenance Repair and Overhaul services for commercial aircraft. LTP has 2.700 staff employed in Manila, Cebu, Davao and Clark all Philippines. It is FAA FAR 145 and EASA JAR 145 certified repair station. Focus is providing AIRBUS A320/330/340 Base- and He...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:2,258
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aeromexico

Aeromexico

MX

Last Update: 22/09/2026

View Profile
721/1000Moderate

Grupo Aeromexico, S.A.B. de C.V. is a holding company whose subsidiaries are engaged in commercial aviation and the promotion of passenger loyalty programs in Mexico. Aeromexico, Mexico’s global airline, operates more than 600 daily flights and has its main hub in Termi...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:14,112
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lufthansa Technik Philippines

Lufthansa Technik Philippines

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aeromexico

Aeromexico

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Technik Philippines in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

Aeromexico has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Lufthansa Technik Philippines (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Technik Philippines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aeromexico (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aeromexico cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lufthansa Technik Philippines

Lufthansa Technik Philippines

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aeromexico

Aeromexico

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AER1790036934

FAQ

Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines company and Aeromexico company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines company and Aeromexico company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines company and Aeromexico company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines company and Aeromexico company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines company and Aeromexico company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines company and Aeromexico company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines and Aeromexico, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines and Aeromexico, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lufthansa Technik Philippines or Aeromexico ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lufthansa Technik Philippines or Aeromexico ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines and Aeromexico, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Philippines and Aeromexico, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA