Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lufthansa SystemsLufthansa Systems
VS
VINCI EnergiesVINCI Energies
Lufthansa Systems

Lufthansa Systems

Am Messeplatz 1, Raunheim, 65479, DE

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.LHsystems.com
763/1000Fair

Lufthansa Systems GmbH the leading airline IT provider determined to shape the future of digital aviation. For almost 30 years, the company has combined profound industry know-how with advanced technological expertise to help airlines unlock their full potential. As a w...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:2,277
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
VINCI Energies

VINCI Energies

2169, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, 92000, FR

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
794/1000Fair

In a world undergoing constant change, VINCI Energies contributes to the environmental transition by helping bring about major trends in the digital landscape and energy sector. VINCI Energies’ teams roll out technologies and integrate customised multi-technical solutio...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:24,873
Subsidiaries:109
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lufthansa Systems

Lufthansa Systems

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VINCI Energies

VINCI Energies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Systems in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI Energies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lufthansa Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VINCI Energies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI Energies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lufthansa Systems

Lufthansa Systems

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
VINCI Energies

VINCI Energies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lufthansa Systems company and VINCI Energies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lufthansa Systems company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lufthansa Systems company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lufthansa Systems company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lufthansa Systems company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lufthansa Systems company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lufthansa Systems company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lufthansa Systems company and VINCI Energies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Systems company and VINCI Energies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Systems company and VINCI Energies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lufthansa Systems company and VINCI Energies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lufthansa Systems and VINCI Energies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Systems and VINCI Energies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lufthansa Systems or VINCI Energies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lufthansa Systems or VINCI Energies ?
Between Lufthansa Systems and VINCI Energies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lufthansa Systems and VINCI Energies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA