Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lufthansa SeeheimLufthansa Seeheim
VS
WhitbreadWhitbread
Lufthansa Seeheim

Lufthansa Seeheim

LUFTHANSARING 1, Seeheim-Jugenheim, 64342, DE

Last Update: 16/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://lufthansa-seeheim.de
772/1000Fair

Ob Tagung, Kongress, Bankett, Seminar, Workshop, oder ein Meeting in einem der modernsten Tagungshotels in Deutschland, Lufthansa Seeheim biete Ihnen beste Voraussetzungen für eine erfolgreiche Veranstaltung. Insgesamt 483 Zimmereinheiten im Lufthansa-Design verfügen ü...

NAICS:721
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:59
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Whitbread

Whitbread

Whitbread Court, Houghton Regis, Dunstable, LU5 5XE, GB

Last Update: 12/07/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Whitbread PLC is the owner of the UK’s favourite hotel chain, Premier Inn, as well as restaurant brands, Beefeater, Brewers Fayre, Table Table, Bar + Block and Cookhouse and Pub. Whitbread employs more than 35,000 people in more than 1,200 Premier Inn hotels and restau...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:13,668
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lufthansa Seeheim

Lufthansa Seeheim

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Whitbread

Whitbread

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Seeheim in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Whitbread in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lufthansa Seeheim (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Seeheim cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Whitbread (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Whitbread cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lufthansa Seeheim

Lufthansa Seeheim

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Whitbread

Whitbread

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lufthansa Seeheim company and Whitbread company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim company and Whitbread company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim company and Whitbread company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim company and Whitbread company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim company and Whitbread company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim company and Whitbread company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim and Whitbread, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim and Whitbread, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lufthansa Seeheim or Whitbread ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lufthansa Seeheim or Whitbread ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim and Whitbread, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lufthansa Seeheim and Whitbread, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1