Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LufftLufft
VS
Grupo TragsaGrupo Tragsa
Lufft

Lufft

Gutenbergstrasse 20, Fellbach, 70736, DE

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.lufft.com
749/1000Moderate

Lufft is a well-established and proven OTT HydroMet brand for meteorological monitoring solutions. Both road maintenance professionals and weather services around the world rely on Lufft sensors and solutions. OTT HydroMet is a developer and manufacturer of world-class...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:35
Subsidiaries:44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

C/ Maldonado 58, Madrid, ES, 28006

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tragsa.es
773/1000Fair

Tragsa Group is a group of public companies, integrated in the State Industrial Ownership Corporation (SEPI), which has become a full service supplier and a reference company to Public Administrations. It is formed by four enterprises: Tragsa (1977) responsible for wor...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:11,674
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lufft

Lufft

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufft in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo Tragsa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lufft (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufft cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo Tragsa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo Tragsa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lufft

Lufft

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo Tragsa

Grupo Tragsa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lufft company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lufft company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lufft company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lufft company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lufft company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lufft company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lufft company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lufft company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lufft company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lufft company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lufft company and Grupo Tragsa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lufft and Grupo Tragsa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lufft and Grupo Tragsa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lufft or Grupo Tragsa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lufft or Grupo Tragsa ?
Between Lufft and Grupo Tragsa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lufft and Grupo Tragsa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9