Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lucova Inc.Lucova Inc.
VS
GFT TechnologiesGFT Technologies
Lucova Inc.

Lucova Inc.

487 Adelaide St W, Toronto, M5V 1T4, CA

Last Update: 11/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lucova.com
748/1000Moderate

Lucova brings technology, data and people together to enhance the human touch-points in the world of in-store commerce. Our tools for small retail to enterprise businesses strengthen the loyal customer behaviour by turning customers’ smartphones into intelligent Bluetoo...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

Schelmenwasenstr. 34, Stuttgart, 70567, DE

Last Update: 20/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gft.com
752/1000Fair

GFT Technologies is an AI-centric global digital transformation company. We design advanced data and AI transformation solutions, modernize technology architectures and develop next-generation core systems for industry leaders in Banking, Insurance, Manufacturing and Ro...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:13,147
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lucova Inc.

Lucova Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lucova Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GFT Technologies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lucova Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lucova Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - GFT Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GFT Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lucova Inc.

Lucova Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
GFT Technologies

GFT Technologies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lucova Inc. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lucova Inc. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lucova Inc. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lucova Inc. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lucova Inc. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lucova Inc. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lucova Inc. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lucova Inc. company and GFT Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lucova Inc. company and GFT Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lucova Inc. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lucova Inc. company and GFT Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lucova Inc. and GFT Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lucova Inc. and GFT Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lucova Inc. or GFT Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lucova Inc. or GFT Technologies ?
Between Lucova Inc. and GFT Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lucova Inc. and GFT Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9