Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lucas Tree Expert CoLucas Tree Expert Co
VS
Kier GroupKier Group
Lucas Tree Expert Co

Lucas Tree Expert Co

PO Box 958, Portland, 04104, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lucastree.com
739/1000Moderate

John Lucas founded the company three generations ago to help the power company complete the electrification of rural Maine. Today, we build on a broad base of loyal employees and customers. We've been present at the birth of most major developments in the tree care in...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:196
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Kier Group

Kier Group

Cavendish Place, UK, GB

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kier.co.uk
757/1000Fair

Our purpose is to sustainably deliver infrastructure which is vital to the UK. As a leading provider of infrastructure services, construction and property developments, we are committed to delivering for communities and leaving lasting legacies through our work. We are...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:11,329
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lucas Tree Expert Co

Lucas Tree Expert Co

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Kier Group

Kier Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lucas Tree Expert Co in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kier Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lucas Tree Expert Co (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lucas Tree Expert Co cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Kier Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kier Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lucas Tree Expert Co

Lucas Tree Expert Co

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LUC509071125
Kier Group

Kier Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lucas Tree Expert Co company and Kier Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co company and Kier Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co company and Kier Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co company and Kier Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co company and Kier Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co company and Kier Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co and Kier Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lucas Tree Expert Co or Kier Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lucas Tree Expert Co or Kier Group ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co and Kier Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lucas Tree Expert Co and Kier Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8