Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lubbock CountyLubbock County
VS
State of MichiganState of Michigan
Lubbock County

Lubbock County

916 Broadway Avenue, Lubbock, 79403, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.lubbockcounty.gov
734/1000Moderate

Lubbock County serves nearly 300,000 residents year round and prides itself in its continued push to deliver efficient public service. As Lubbock County grows in both size and opportunities, we prioritize selecting employees who apply professionalism, integrity, and com...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:525
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

State Capitol, Lansing, Michigan, US, 48913

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

Every day the contributions and achievements of State of Michigan employees have a direct impact on over 10 million Michiganders across the state. If you're looking for a fulfilling career in state government that can make a real difference in the lives of others, you c...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:35,704
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lubbock County

Lubbock County

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lubbock County in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of Michigan in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lubbock County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lubbock County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - State of Michigan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Michigan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lubbock County

Lubbock County

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LUB120261222
State of Michigan

State of Michigan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lubbock County company and State of Michigan company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lubbock County company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lubbock County company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lubbock County company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lubbock County company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lubbock County company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lubbock County company and State of Michigan company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lubbock County company and State of Michigan company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lubbock County company and State of Michigan company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lubbock County company and State of Michigan company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lubbock County company and State of Michigan company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lubbock County and State of Michigan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lubbock County and State of Michigan, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lubbock County or State of Michigan ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lubbock County or State of Michigan ?
Between Lubbock County and State of Michigan, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lubbock County and State of Michigan, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2