Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.
VS
UPSUPS
L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

Hyderabad Metro Rail Administrative Building, Hyderabad Metro Train Depot, Uppal Main Road, Nagole,, Hyderabad, Telangana 500039, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500039, IN

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ltmetro.com/
755/1000Fair

Hyderabad Metro Rail Project is the World's Largest Public-Private Partnership Project (PPP) in the Metro Sector. Metros and MRTS (Mass Rapid Transport System) are emerging as a major area for infrastructure development in major cities with high population (around 8...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:704
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UPS

UPS

55 Glenlake Parkway, NE, Atlanta, 30328, US

Last Update: 25/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://about.ups.com/
800/1000Good

Operating in more than 200 countries and territories, we’re committed to moving our world forward by delivering what matters. Beginning as a small messenger service, UPS was started by two enterprising teenagers and a $100 loan. Now, we’re almost 500,000 UPSers strong, ...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:182,515
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UPS

UPS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

UPS has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UPS

UPS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LHDUPS1784960664
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UPS134025623

FAQ

Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and UPS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and UPS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and UPS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and UPS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and UPS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and UPS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and UPS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and UPS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and UPS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and UPS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and UPS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. and UPS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. and UPS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. or UPS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. or UPS ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. and UPS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. and UPS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1