Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.
VS
Transport for NSWTransport for NSW
L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

Hyderabad Metro Rail Administrative Building, Hyderabad Metro Train Depot, Uppal Main Road, Nagole,, Hyderabad, Telangana 500039, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500039, IN

Last Update: 22/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ltmetro.com/
755/1000Fair

Hyderabad Metro Rail Project is the World's Largest Public-Private Partnership Project (PPP) in the Metro Sector. Metros and MRTS (Mass Rapid Transport System) are emerging as a major area for infrastructure development in major cities with high population (around 8...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:704
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

Multiple locations , Multiple locations across the state, AU

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

We’re an innovative NSW government organisation comprised of a network of agencies and divisions that keep the state moving. Our focus is on delivering safe, reliable and integrated transport networks for everyone. With over 28,000 team members, we’re committed to incl...

NAICS:484
NAICS Definition:Truck Transportation
Employees:18,452
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transport for NSW in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Transport for NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transport for NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Transport for NSW

Transport for NSW

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TRA303092125

FAQ

Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and Transport for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and Transport for NSW company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and Transport for NSW company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. company and Transport for NSW company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. and Transport for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. and Transport for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. or Transport for NSW ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. or Transport for NSW ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. and Transport for NSW, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between L&T Metro Rail (Hyderabad) Ltd. and Transport for NSW, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA