Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia PacificLufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific
VS
LufthansaLufthansa
Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific

Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific

35/F, 118 Connaught Road West, Sai Ying Pun, Hong Kong, undefined, undefined, HK

Last Update: 29/01/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

Located in the heart of the fastest growing aviation market in the world, Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific in Hong Kong is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lufthansa Technik that specializes in providing aircraft component supply solutions. As the regional ...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:21
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lufthansa

Lufthansa

Airportring, Frankfurt am Main, 60549, DE

Last Update: 17/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://lufthansa.com
784/1000Fair

Lufthansa is one of the world’s leading airlines, connecting passengers to over 200 destinations across 74 countries from our hubs in Frankfurt and Munich. As an industry pioneer, we are committed to shaping the future of sustainable aviation, investing in next-generat...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:19,452
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific

Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lufthansa

Lufthansa

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lufthansa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific

Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lufthansa

Lufthansa

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific company and Lufthansa company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific company and Lufthansa company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific company and Lufthansa company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific company and Lufthansa company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific company and Lufthansa company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific company and Lufthansa company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific and Lufthansa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific and Lufthansa, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific or Lufthansa ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific or Lufthansa ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific and Lufthansa, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lufthansa Technik Component Services Asia Pacific and Lufthansa, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA