Comparison Overview
LSS Facilities

LSS Facilities
Parkview, Uxbridge, undefined, UB8 1UX, GB
Last Update: 24/04/2026
LSS delivers facilities services and management to sport and leisure venues. With numerous high profile clients we ensure high standard services are provided to ensure smooth operations and an enhanced guest experience. Our delivery is focused on the core disciplines o...

Sodexo
255 quai de la bataille de Stalingrad, 92866 Issy les Moulineaux Cedex 9, FR
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Founded in Marseille in 1966 by Pierre Bellon, Sodexo is the leader in Food and Services, shaping better everyday experiences at every moment in life: work, heal, learn and play. The Group stands out for its independence, its founding family shareholding and its respons...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

LSS Facilities







Sodexo






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for LSS Facilities in 2026.
Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sodexo in 2026.
Incident History - LSS Facilities (X = Date, Y = Severity)
LSS Facilities cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sodexo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sodexo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

LSS Facilities

Sodexo
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.