Comparison Overview

LPM

VS

REMAX

LPM

Floor 4, Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park, E203BS, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 650 and 699

LPM is a residential property management and lettings company. Our company offers a high-quality service from a dedicated team, trained and qualified to Propertymark’s ARLA standards. We make the connection between high quality marketing, to attract high-quality tenants which will lead to maximising your investment. We pride ourselves on delivering a great customer experience unrivalled by our competitors. Use of the latest technology allows landlords and tenants to sign contract renewal or check their latest statement, any time of the day from the comfort of their computer or phone using our Landlord Portal. At the heart of our business is the absolute commitment to remove the stress that comes from managing your property investment.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

REMAX

5075 S. Syracuse St., Denver, 80237, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

As one of the leading global real estate franchisors, RE/MAX, LLC is a subsidiary of RE/MAX Holdings (NYSE: RMAX) with more than 140,000 agents in almost 9,000 offices and a presence in more than 110 countries and territories. Nobody in the world sells more real estate than RE/MAX, as measured by residential transaction sides. RE/MAX was founded in 1973 by Dave and Gail Liniger, with an innovative, entrepreneurial culture affording its agents and franchisees the flexibility to operate their businesses with great independence. RE/MAX agents have lived, worked and served in their local communities for decades, raising millions of dollars every year for Children’s Miracle Network Hospitals® and other charities. To learn more about RE/MAX, to search home listings or find an agent in your community, please visit www.remax.com. For the latest news about RE/MAX, please visit news.remax.com. Each Office Independently Owned and Operated.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 46,432
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lpm-property-management.jpeg
LPM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/remax.jpeg
REMAX
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LPM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
REMAX
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LPM in 2026.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for REMAX in 2026.

Incident History — LPM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LPM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — REMAX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

REMAX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lpm-property-management.jpeg
LPM
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Cloud Storage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/remax.jpeg
REMAX
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

REMAX company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to LPM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

LPM company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas REMAX company has not reported any.

In the current year, REMAX company and LPM company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither REMAX company nor LPM company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

LPM company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other REMAX company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither REMAX company nor LPM company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LPM company nor REMAX company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LPM nor REMAX holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

REMAX company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to LPM company.

REMAX company employs more people globally than LPM company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither LPM nor REMAX holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LPM nor REMAX holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LPM nor REMAX holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LPM nor REMAX holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LPM nor REMAX holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LPM nor REMAX holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.