Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Lovelace Health SystemLovelace Health System
VS
Memorial Hermann Health SystemMemorial Hermann Health System
Lovelace Health System

Lovelace Health System

601 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Ave NE, Albuquerque, 87102, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.lovelace.com
709/1000Moderate

For nearly 100 years, Lovelace Health System has set new standards of care in New Mexico through revolutionary advances in medicine and surgery. Today, that legacy of accomplishment continues in our commitment to advanced technology and sensitive care. At Lovelace, we b...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:2,220
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial Hermann Health System

Houston, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
757/1000Fair

Advancing Health. Personalizing Care. Memorial Hermann Health System is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. A fully integrated health system with more than 260 care delivery sites throughout the Greater Houston area...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:19,509
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Lovelace Health System

Lovelace Health System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial Hermann Health System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lovelace Health System in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Memorial Hermann Health System in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Lovelace Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lovelace Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Memorial Hermann Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Memorial Hermann Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Lovelace Health System

Lovelace Health System

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LOV7215224
Memorial Hermann Health System

Memorial Hermann Health System

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MEM12145522
🔒 Incident : Breach
MEM308071625

FAQ

Between Lovelace Health System company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Lovelace Health System company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Lovelace Health System company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Lovelace Health System company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Lovelace Health System company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Lovelace Health System company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Lovelace Health System company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Lovelace Health System company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Lovelace Health System company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Lovelace Health System company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Lovelace Health System company and Memorial Hermann Health System company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Lovelace Health System and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Lovelace Health System and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Lovelace Health System or Memorial Hermann Health System ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Lovelace Health System or Memorial Hermann Health System ?
Between Lovelace Health System and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Lovelace Health System and Memorial Hermann Health System, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2