Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier ConseilLouvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil
VS
Keller Williams Realty, LLCKeller Williams Realty, LLC
Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil

Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil

48, Rue du Louvre, Paris, Île-de-France, 75001, FR

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile

Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil (LBPIC) est un acteur de référence depuis 14 ans dans l'investissement immobilier en direct. Filiale de Louvre Banque Privée depuis avril 2020, nous proposons aux clients de La Banque Postale et de Louvre Banque Privée une sélect...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:41
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Suite 400, Austin, TX, US, 78746

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://headquarters.kw.com/
799/1000Fair

Austin, Texas-based Keller Williams, the world’s largest real estate franchise by agent count, has more than 1,100 offices and 176,000 agents. The franchise is also No. 1 in units and sales volume in the United States. Since 1983, the company has cultivated an agent-c...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:102,888
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil

Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keller Williams Realty, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Keller Williams Realty, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keller Williams Realty, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil

Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KEL020091825

FAQ

Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil or Keller Williams Realty, LLC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil or Keller Williams Realty, LLC ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Louvre Banque Privée Immobilier Conseil and Keller Williams Realty, LLC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1