Comparison Overview

Louis Dreyfus Company

VS

Arla Foods

Louis Dreyfus Company

Westblaak 92, Rotterdam, South Holland, 3012 KM, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ldc.com

Louis Dreyfus Company is a leading merchant and processor of agricultural goods. We leverage our global reach and extensive asset network to serve our customers and consumers around the world, delivering the right products to the right location, at the right time – safely, responsibly and reliably. Our activities span the entire value chain from farm to fork, across a broad range of business lines (platforms). Since 1851 our portfolio has grown to include Grains & Oilseeds, Food & Feed Solutions, Coffee, Cotton, Juice, Rice, Sugar, Freight and Global Markets. We help feed and clothe some 500 million people every year by originating, processing and transporting approximately 80 million tons of products. Structured as a matrix organization of six geographical regions and nine platforms, Louis Dreyfus Company is active in over 100 countries and employs approximately 18,000 people globally. For more information, visit www.ldc.com.

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition: Food Manufacturing
Employees: 11,897
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Arla Foods

Sønderhøj 14, Viby, 8260, DK
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.arla.com

We are more than 23,000 colleagues across 39 countries and 7,624 dairy farmer-owners in Denmark, Sweden, United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands. We aim to create the future of dairy, to bring healthy and sustainable dairy products to people across the world, and to lead the transition towards sustainable dairy farming and production. We work continuously on the farms, at the dairies, and in our administration to reduce our carbon footprint and environmental impact. We are committed to champion good food habits and inspire a healthy life. We collaborate with NGOs and public stakeholders to develop viable dairy sectors in our emerging markets and to ensure access to affordable dairy nutrients. And we take our responsibility, our relationships, and our role in society seriously. Through these actions, we support a stronger planet and enable stronger people. We work together with our customers, scientists, suppliers, NGO’s, and other stakeholders who help us develop our business. Our consumers will benefit from our innovative approach and quality focus through our well-known brands Arla®, Lurpak®, Castello®, and Puck®, which are sold in more than 120 countries. • Revenue 2024: 13.8 billion EUR • Cooperative farmer owners 2024: 7,624 • Milk volume 2024: 13.7bn kilogram

NAICS: 311
NAICS Definition: Food Manufacturing
Employees: 14,250
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louis-dreyfus-company.jpeg
Louis Dreyfus Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arla-foods.jpeg
Arla Foods
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Louis Dreyfus Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arla Foods
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Louis Dreyfus Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Arla Foods has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Louis Dreyfus Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Louis Dreyfus Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arla Foods (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arla Foods cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/louis-dreyfus-company.jpeg
Louis Dreyfus Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arla-foods.jpeg
Arla Foods
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Arla Foods company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Louis Dreyfus Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Arla Foods company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Louis Dreyfus Company company has not reported any.

In the current year, Arla Foods company has reported more cyber incidents than Louis Dreyfus Company company.

Neither Arla Foods company nor Louis Dreyfus Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arla Foods company nor Louis Dreyfus Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Arla Foods company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Louis Dreyfus Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Louis Dreyfus Company company nor Arla Foods company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Louis Dreyfus Company nor Arla Foods holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Arla Foods company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Louis Dreyfus Company company.

Arla Foods company employs more people globally than Louis Dreyfus Company company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Manufacturing.

Neither Louis Dreyfus Company nor Arla Foods holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Louis Dreyfus Company nor Arla Foods holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Louis Dreyfus Company nor Arla Foods holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Louis Dreyfus Company nor Arla Foods holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Louis Dreyfus Company nor Arla Foods holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Louis Dreyfus Company nor Arla Foods holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References