Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

LOTTE chemicalLOTTE chemical
VS
Air LiquideAir Liquide
LOTTE chemical

LOTTE chemical

14-16Fl, Lotte World Tower 300 Olympic-ro, Seoul, Songpa-gu, 05551, KR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.lottechem.com
761/1000Fair

1976년에 설립된 롯데케미칼은 첨단석유화학기술을 토착화하고 꾸준한 기술개발에 주력하여 그 입지를 탄탄히 다지고 있습니다. 롯데케미칼 여수, 대산, 울산 공장은 국내외 최고 규모를 자랑합니다. 올레핀, 방향족 사업과 같은 석유화학 기초원료 및 제품 생산은 물론 꾸준한 공장 증설과 사업 확장으로 원료에서 제품에 이르는 수직계열화를 이뤘습니다. 효율적인 공정을 통해 고품질의 제품을 생산하는 롯데케미칼의 대표제품으로는 에틸렌, HDPE, LDPE, LLDPE, PP, 기능성수지, E...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:1,881
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Air Liquide

Air Liquide

75 quai d'Orsay, Paris, 75007, FR

Last Update: 08/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.airliquide.com
827/1000Good

Air Liquide is a world leader in gases, technologies and services for industry and healthcare. Present in 72 countries with 67,800 employees, the Group serves more than 4 million customers and patients. Oxygen, nitrogen and hydrogen are essential small molecules for lif...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:39,659
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
LOTTE chemical

LOTTE chemical

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Air Liquide

Air Liquide

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LOTTE chemical in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Air Liquide in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - LOTTE chemical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LOTTE chemical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Air Liquide (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Air Liquide cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
LOTTE chemical

LOTTE chemical

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Air Liquide

Air Liquide

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between LOTTE chemical company and Air Liquide company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between LOTTE chemical company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between LOTTE chemical company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between LOTTE chemical company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between LOTTE chemical company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between LOTTE chemical company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between LOTTE chemical company and Air Liquide company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between LOTTE chemical company and Air Liquide company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between LOTTE chemical company and Air Liquide company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between LOTTE chemical company and Air Liquide company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between LOTTE chemical company and Air Liquide company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between LOTTE chemical and Air Liquide, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between LOTTE chemical and Air Liquide, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - LOTTE chemical or Air Liquide ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - LOTTE chemical or Air Liquide ?
Between LOTTE chemical and Air Liquide, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between LOTTE chemical and Air Liquide, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2