Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Longevity HealthLongevity Health
VS
MultiCare Health SystemMultiCare Health System
Longevity Health

Longevity Health

11780 US Highway 1, Palm Beach Gardens, 33408, US

Last Update: 16/04/2026

View Profile
685/1000Weak

Longevity Health is a clinical services company and national Institutional Special Needs Plan (ISNP) founded with the purpose of optimizing the quality of life for people in long-term care by focusing on their individualized health needs. Launched in 2018, our ISNP was...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:427
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
MultiCare Health System

MultiCare Health System

315 Martin Luther King Jr. Way, Tacoma, WA, US, 98415

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://jobs.multicare.org
724/1000Moderate

MultiCare’s roots in the Pacific Northwest go back to 1882, with the founding of Tacoma’s first hospital. Over the years, we’ve grown from a Tacoma-centric, hospital-based organization into the largest, community-based, locally governed health system in the state of Wa...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:12,426
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Longevity Health

Longevity Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MultiCare Health System

MultiCare Health System

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Longevity Health has 28.06% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MultiCare Health System in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Longevity Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Longevity Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MultiCare Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MultiCare Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Longevity Health

Longevity Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
LON1776364070
MultiCare Health System

MultiCare Health System

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
MUL20314123
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MUL752072725

FAQ

Between Longevity Health company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Longevity Health company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Longevity Health company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Longevity Health company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Longevity Health company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Longevity Health company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Longevity Health company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Longevity Health company and MultiCare Health System company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Longevity Health company and MultiCare Health System company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Longevity Health company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Longevity Health company and MultiCare Health System company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Longevity Health and MultiCare Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Longevity Health and MultiCare Health System, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Longevity Health or MultiCare Health System ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Longevity Health or MultiCare Health System ?
Between Longevity Health and MultiCare Health System, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Longevity Health and MultiCare Health System, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8